While the Constitution forbids prohibiting a mosque from being built blocks away from ground zero ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."), Republicans are salivating at the prospect of ignoring the constitution (again) and using this for political hay.
Apparently, the Family Values Party is not concerned with the strip clubs (like New York Dolls) that surround hallowed ground (after all, we all know that Hooters is a family restaurant and Fox News is not conservative day time porn), because nothing says Christian Values and Apple Pie like a strip club.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (225)
Yes, we will fight for our rights to strip but you can take your religious freedom, the very thing this country was founded on, and shove it! Hey, if you don’t like strip clubs, we have the Ground Zero Trashy Lingerie store. Or if you’re really feeling crummy about your inability to stir up religious hate, you can wander over to the Pussycat Lounge, described as “the place strippers go to die” and just blocks from so called Hallowed Ground, we can call this Ground Zero-Ish Strip Club.
- 35 votes
We know what is really sacred to the Party of No...strippers!
By the way, Barry, why did WTC #7, a modern steel building, with only incidental damage (not hit by a plane) collapse identical to a controlled demolition?
Also, the planes that hit the WTC caused a fireball apparently hot enough to cause the only collapse of steel buildings (due to fire) in history...yet Mohammed Atta's passport was found on the street, unscathed.
I am not exactly sure what happened on 9/11, but I am not so sure that Muslims are solely at fault.
Barry, is '62 your birth year or I.Q.?
Just asking in parallel fashion to your hideously offensive post.
- 7 votes
This whole episode is more propaganda from the "Real"evil empire; Republican/Tea Potty types! Right now congress is in recess, everyday is a slow news day; but right on que, up pops another political controversy. A none issue, if one has the slightest respect for the U S Constitution and Bill Of Rights. More, us against them,divide and conquer PROPAGANDA, 24 hours a day-7 days a week!
Led by the USUAL suspects,Palin,Angle,Newt,Limbaugh,Beck ect... the beat goes on. The aforementioned, as repeatedly demonstrated,have disdain for the pillars of our society; U S Constitution and Bill of Rights. They also, as demonstrated, have a similar disdain for the democractic process of governance; as witnessed with the LOCK STEP opposition to everything since Bush/Cheney left office. With these Tyrants, it's Their way or No way,Period!
Least we forget,Bush/Cheney ascended to office with the promise of a KINDLER-MORE GENTLER,brand of CONSERVATISM! They lied! After starting two Wars,Tax Cuts to the wealthy,Stacking the Federal Bench with RIGHT WING idealouge activists,Deregulating everything that needs regulating, Destroying the U S Economy, and on and on, NOW THEY WANT THEIR COUNTRY BACK? Why???
From Death Panels to Socialism, and everything in between, all they offer is FEAR,FEAR,and More FEAR. Not a single proposed solution to anything. Yet, some DUMB ASS Americans are still supporting them. Why? Ladies and gentlemen, when the U S Constitution and Bill Of Rights become the ENEMY; something to nik-pik,skirt,disregard,repeal and replace, we have indeed lost the "WAR ON TERROR". And as Bin Laden said,"WE WILL DESTROY YOU"! How utterly prophetic of HIM! It appears to me THE EVIL EMPIRE is right here among us. And as one soldier once told his General after returning from a recon mission;" WE HAVE FOUND THE ENEMY SIR, IT IS US"! A country that refuses to live by it's own tenants, but wants to spread it's brand of governance around the world ,will absolutely be seen as a Fraud and Hypocrite,and who among us could disagree with that perception...that is other than the Republicans/Tea Potty Types,which evidently worships those attributes!
- 13 votes
Hypocrisy, thy name is the GOBP.
This empty moral argument is as hallow as their leadership in the W years and shows the same vacuousness that they'll bring if they return to power.
- 9 votes
I would not mind about any strip clubs, but of course it is good to keep everything in mind.
- 4 votes
Here's a few links to articles and photos about the "adult entertainment" available in the "ground zero" area:
Mosque gets all the press, but area near Ground Zero full of bars, porn, liquor stores, salons
- 11 votes
You are trying to compare placing a mosque near the World Trade Centers attack versus a strip club?
Talk about a stretch. You liberals never cease to amaze lol.
- 2 votes
The RNC doesn't like to refer to them as "strip clubs." They refer to them as "fundraising venues."
- 14 votes
@ Douglasq Well, they raise something!!
Common Sense attack incoming: This wouldn't even be a seed on newsvine if it wasn't for the support your Messiah has given Muslims for putting up a mosque in an area MOST civilized Americans would think is a sacred spot of land. Sure it was destroyed by Radicals, but the fact is, is that it was destroyed by people who follow Islam. Radical or not.
Time and time again the terrorists visit a nudy bar to watch them bounnce before blowing themselves up. (I think they wanted a pro before all the noobs in the afterlife) It only makes sense to put one next to it. The ones that come over to pay a little homage to the silicone should be watched very closely by homeland security as possible terrorists. Common sense and so, so simple.
- 1 vote
I don't want any catholic churches near any public schools either, their pedophiles are catholic.
- 4 votes
Ah yes ... there you go libbie!!! When Islam is topic of discussion ... drag Christianity into the fray!!! Good job!
As if the two religions are even remotely close. One teaches jihad, the other doesn't.
Ever heard of "Freedom of religion"?
How do you know the two religions aren't even remotely close? Have you read the Quran?
- 10 votes
Paul-705255 to suggest the two religions aren't close is the greatest display of your ignorance. I suggest a few classes in theology, symbolism, and culture. May your little world crumble to reality.
- 7 votes
i take offense to the title of this little dity. the fact that i am a republican has nothing to do with the fact that i support a strippers right to work anywhere in the US.
also, i think the real point is being missed. the idea is that it looks bad to open up a mosque (cultural center) while we are fighting terrorism in the middle and far east. its the idea of it, not the legality. they are well within their rights to upen up the center. the people are well within their rights to be upset about it.
i would almost say its the same as supporting dr. laura's right to freedom of speech while still being upset with what she said.
- 1 vote
Ah yes ... there you go libbie!!! When Islam is topic of discussion ... drag Christianity into the fray!!!
Hey, you're the one who brought up a Messiah.
This wouldn't even be a seed on newsvine if it wasn't for the support your Messiah has given Muslims for putting up a mosque in an area MOST civilized Americans would think is a sacred spot of land.
Yep, sacred enough to get lap dances at.
- 9 votes
And still, we don't see policy details from the current neocon led GOP.
Distraction, Distraction, Distraction
Show us the policy points, not the talking points!
- 6 votes
Pacific Norwest blogger,
Care to list the good things your party has done since Obama was crowned?
- 3 votes
As if the two religions are even remotely close. One teaches jihad, the other doesn't.
Ahhh Paul. You have no idea how close the two really are... In Islam, the Bible and Jesus (pbuh) are just as important as the Qur'an and Muhammad (pbuh).
And a little reminder about Jihad... The christians started it with the Crusades and the Inquisition. There is no historical record of Jihad being directly associated with a religious war in Islam until after the second Crusade and again during the Inquisition... So we can all thank the Vatican for spurring the Jihad idea and movement.
http://www.islamic-dictionary.com/index.php?word=Jihad&x=0&y=0
Originally and for the first 700 years after Muhammad (pbuh) passed away, the first definition of Jihad was all that muslims knew. After the Crusades, the term started to be used in reference to fighting against the Crusaders. And they used the word to describe the war against the crusaders because the crusaders' motivation was to expel muslims from the holy land, thus making it a religious war.
Just like we use the word struggle or conflict to describe war, jihad literally translated means "struggle" in arabic. So... in hadith, someone eventually asked Muhammad (pbuh) if the struggle against Mecca was the same as the struggle against sin and he basically said No, the struggle of war is minor compared to the struggle to resist temptation and sin... and so from that people, 700 years later extracted Major Jihad (the struggle against sin) and Minor Jihad (religious wars against oppression).
But to say Islam "teaches" Jihad makes no sense.... Since the word means "Struggle" and is most commonly used in Islam (not in the US) to describe the struggle against vice and sin...
So to tie this all together with the topic at hand... Staying away from strip clubs is a Jihad most muslim men face. ;-)
- 3 votes
Geez where would the Rnc hold their parties in NY if they closed that site?
- 2 votes
Wakeuppeople, why was Muhammed chosen by god as a prophet?
- 1 vote
I rarely ever vote anything as inaccurate but I did on this story for obvious reasons.
Because Republicans don't support Strip Clubs on Ground Zero. I know I don't and I count myself as a Republican.
I come here to learn McSpocky not to be attacked on a daily basis. What some of the far left members on the vine have been doing is the same as bullying. It's as if you and some of your Left minded friends have set out to drive people like me out of the vine. This is one of my social spots where I come to interact. It's not like I can get out and socialize with others because I can't. I don't want to go to a Republican Forum either because I like hearing issues from all different sides. In all honesty I have found only one place on the web that I like to hang out and read and it's here.
- 1 vote
You do realize there's a button down at the bottom labeled "Stop Tracking," right? Whining about how those evil far left on Vine are out to getcha is rather pathetic when your participation is any discussion is entirely voluntary, Jason.
- 5 votes
There are right-wingers on the vine who write articles attacking the left with much more vigor than this article that I "seeded", which its intent is to attack no one. Its purpose is to show the hypocrisy of the Right in not wanting a Islamic community center in the area, while they consider it to be okay to have adult entertainment on the same supposed sacred ground.
- 5 votes
Wakeuppeople, why was Muhammed chosen by god as a prophet?
That seems like kind of a random question in relation to the topic of this thread?!?! That is not a question I can answer, because I really can't speak for god. He never really spells out why in the Qur'an, just that he did chose him.
You could ask the same question of any of religious figures really... Why Mary? Why Moses? Why Abraham? Why Noah? etc...
Honestly, this thread probably isn't the best place to discuss this... But, from what I have learned some people speculate he was chosen for many different reasons, not just one. He was extremely religious, even though he was considered a pagan before he was chosen. He was an orphan, and because of such had no formal schooling and he couldn't read or write. He was from a very well known and respected family in Mecca at the time, so everyone knew who he was and knew his story and how he had lost his parents when he was very young. He married a very wealthy woman business-owner and so his wife had a lot of pull within the community. And her business was trade, so Muhammad would lead the caravans across the desert for her (that's how they met initially). So you could say, Muhammad might have been like a modern day Kennedy who lost his parents and became an orphan, and his extended family took all of his parents money while he was a baby so he didn't have enough money for an education...so he eventually became a truck driver and ended up marrying the women that owned the freight company he was driving for. If you were to make a movie of a "modern day" Muhammad (pbuh), that is what his life would have been BEFORE the angel Gabriel first contacted him.
At the time of Muhammad (pbuh) arabic writing and arabic poetry were flourishing. So if god had picked a literary scholar to give the Qur'an to, it would have been easier for people to write it off and not take it seriously. But because everyone knew Muhammad and his life story, to all of a sudden hear him start speaking poetry that was so perfectly constructed, everyone including the arabic scholars at the time were astounded. Because of that, some people say god chose muhammad so that there would be no doubt the Qur'an was not man made, and not Muhammad's own words.
God sends his messengers with a gift/miracle to outdo whatever area is being considered as the forefront of the time. Muhammad's was poetry. Jesus was medicine and healing. David was music and song. Moses was law. Noah was engineering... and so on. So in that regard, who better to bring forth god's poetic writing than a person who cannot read or write? And if God had picked an uneducated man that nobody knew, then people would dismiss him. But since everyone knew of Muhammad's lineage, and knew of his parents death and that he wasn't educated... it really drove home the point that, "whoa, there is no way this guy could be coming up with this type of poetry!"
I'm sure there are many other reasons why Muhammad (pbuh) was chosen. Only god knows for sure what they are. We can only speculate and guess.
- 4 votes
Its purpose is to show the hypocrisy of the Right in not wanting a Islamic community center in the area, while they consider it to be okay to have adult entertainment on the same supposed sacred ground.
Then the article is wrong and inaccurate nor is the Right being hypocritical. The problem isn't the Muslims not having a right to build their Mosque just in the insensitivity to a group of people who have victimized enough. Why the left such as yourself do not seem to be able to grasp what Howard Dean and other Democrats have been able to grasp is a mystery in itself.
McSpocky, you have aligned yourself with a group of people who don't give a @!$%# about the victims of 9-11. The victims being the parents, husbands, wives, fathers, mothers, etc. that have to keep living day in and day out knowing that their loved ones were taken away by 19 Islamic Radicals.
You also know that I'm one of a very small select few who is 100% crippled. You know that I use this site to interact and converse with those I have differences with. I cannot get out of the house, go to a bar, run with my dogs. You also know that I enjoy talking to you but frequent daily attacks on what I believe gets old.
There are right-wingers on the vine who write articles attacking the left with much more vigor than this article
But they write and it's not day after day. I could do what you do. Just link right winged hate articles but what good would that do. That's just being mean and evil. I don't want to hurt you or do anything to cause you pain. I get mad. I may lash out. In the end though I would rather we talked it out and us be friends.
Its purpose is to show the hypocrisy of the Right in not wanting a Islamic community center in the area
But it was wrong. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.
Whining about how those evil far left on Vine are out to getcha is rather pathetic
I never see you on this website nor do I know who you are. I know Mcspocky which is who my comment was directed at but you not so much. So, go back to your little rock and crawl back under it. Unless you like calling cripples pathetic which may just be how you get your jollies.
Jason
I am a disabled Vet. Something that you seem to be missing I will now explain.
No-one has forgotten 9-11. In fact GWB's Legal adviser lost his wife that day and even he has defended the Constitution in this case. Is it a good idea to build it anywhere near ground zero really isn't the point. The right to build it is. When we ignore our own Laws and let emotion rule the day an our actions then the radicals will have won. I don't think it's a good idea to have fast food places every 2 blocks but the people who own them have the right to be there.
- 4 votes
Is it a good idea to build it anywhere near ground zero really isn't the point.
It's exactly the point. As Muslims are allowed to build their mosque and inflict even more damage on the victims of 9-11 then so to is it allowed for people to point this fact out. It's in the Muslims ball court but expect protests and free speech to be used to drive home the point that building a 100 million dollar mosque 2 blocks from Ground zero isn't a smart affair.
The right to build it is.
Who is saying they can't? Everybody I know is saying they can. Nobody is ignoring the law.
The Muslim community could do a lot of good by saying "We acknowledge the sensitivity of this issue and we are meeting with the Governor to make new plans."
Instead they are generating ill will. It's completely on them.
let emotion rule the day
9-11 is an emotional subject... at least to me it is. I'll never forget where I was and what I was doing when I saw the second plane smash into the World Trade Center. I'll never forget seeing people falling from the building or watching that man slip and fall as he was crawling down. Watching the building fall and knowing at that instant that thousands had died. Pretty emotional feeling.
We seem to forget about the victims in this country. In most cases we just piss on them. This just another case where the victims are being @!$%# on.
Should the Muslims decide to go ahead then I expect that every Mosque in America will be the focus where Free Speech and Protests are held. I know I won't look at Muslims the same way should they go down this path.
For the liberal far left I still don't see how they can preach about Freedom of Religion after all the attacks they have conducted on those who worship the Christian Religion. To me them sticking up for the Muslims building this mosque just doesn't make sense unless their is ulterior motive and agenda.
In all this is about what is Right and what is Wrong. Liberals have pretty much said "@!$%# You" to the victims of 9-11 and thats a pretty ugly bed to have made for oneself. I know that by the time this is done that my kids won't forget it and neither will their friends.
Nobody said they couldn't build the building but nobody said that people couldn't protest it being built either.
As I said I'm a Vet and I defend the Constitution and the Law. That said they have the right and people have the right to not like it. It would be like me saying to you that you shouldn't build a ramp for your front door because it makes your house stand out from those around you.
Then there is the fact that the Law is very clear on this issue. Should we just ignore it so that it makes others comfortable? Should we drop them and rule on just emotion? People want to bring up things like Sharia Law but giving into emotion would make us no better than the radicals who take that Law to extremes. How do we keep our faith as a nation if we allow ourselves to ignore the foundations we where built on and adopt the ideals that the rules should be changed the way the radicals have corrupted theirs?
We can't because if we did then we would be no better than those we fight against. You and everyone else who would allow emotion to rule over the Law need to understand this. We cannot go by emotion when the Law is clear but it doesn't mean we have to like it. The days of Separate but equal are gone and it was deemed to be illegal. Would you have us return to the days of legal separation just to satisfy the need for revenge?
- 5 votes
People want to bring up things like Sharia Law but giving into emotion would make us no better than the radicals who take that Law to extremes. How do we keep our faith as a nation if we allow ourselves to ignore the foundations we where built on and adopt the ideals that the rules should be changed the way the radicals have corrupted theirs?
Eloquently put, Tony.
- 7 votes
It's so easy to stomp on the civil rights of "others". People begin to sing a different tune when it is their civil rights being stomped on though.
- 5 votes
Unless you like calling cripples pathetic which may just be how you get your jollies.
Ha, I don't give a s--- that you're, as you put it, a "cripple" (especially since, as you noted, I've likely never seen you on the Vine before, thus wouldn't know that). But hey, it's nice to know that you use your handicap to create a victim complex to excuse any criticism of your asshattery. Classy, dear chap.
McSpocky, you have aligned yourself with a group of people who don't give a @!$%# about the victims of 9-11.
Including the 250+ 9/11 victims' families who publicly support the mosque? I guess they just don't a give a s---, either, right?
The Muslim community could do a lot of good by saying "We acknowledge the sensitivity of this issue and we are meeting with the Governor to make new plans."
Instead they are generating ill will. It's completely on them.
You do realize that the community center has a room dedicated to quiet reflection on 9/11, right? Oh, but I'm sure it's not for sensitive quiet reflection.
Further, the amount of press coverage on a certain facet of a controversial issue has little bearing on what (or how much) the Muslim community is actually saying. Case in point, right after 9/11, many prominent Muslims around the world roundly condemned the acts as contrary to the spirit and doctrine of Islam, but hey, we didn't hear anything about this on the news. We just saw clips of some Muslim mobs cheering 9/11.
We seem to forget about the victims in this country. In most cases we just piss on them. This just another case where the victims are being @!$%# on.
Ah, of course. Anyone who assumes that any Muslim community center is simply there to give the finger to 9/11 victims must only be thinking of the victims, while anyone who thinks otherwise is "piss[ing] on [the victims."
Yep, that totally makes sense.
Should the Muslims decide to go ahead then I expect that every Mosque in America will be the focus where Free Speech and Protests are held. I know I won't look at Muslims the same way should they go down this path.
Since you seem to equate Muslims to 9/11, I'd say you'd look at Muslims askance regardless of whether or not this mosque goes up.
In all this is about what is Right and what is Wrong. Liberals have pretty much said "@!$%# You" to the victims of 9-11 and thats a pretty ugly bed to have made for oneself. I know that by the time this is done that my kids won't forget it and neither will their friends.
Man, it must feel good to be able to haughtily make s--- up with a completely straight face.
- 5 votes
I think a lot of people who are saying the community center is insensitive should read this article that was seeded on the vine...
It really drives home the point that this country IS freedom and liberty for all. And there are Americians who happen to be muslims who fight and die for this country right along side other americans who happen to be christians and jews.
And to use a quote that the article used...
George Washington himself once wrote to a Jewish congregation in Rhode Island, reassuring them of our nation's religious tolerance. "For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support."
- 5 votes
There is even to be a 9/11 Memorial built in the community center.
http://illuminate.newsvine.com/_news/2010/08/20/4938838-to-ny-muslims-islamic-center-near-ground-zero-would-be-more-than-a-mosque
- 5 votes
Darn those facts, McSpocky! You can't go and mention the memorial around the right wingers, they refuse to admit it's even a possibility...
- 5 votes
Isn't it ironic how they team up with everything they hate to show their bigotry? Strip clubs, gay bars, .... what's next?
- 17 votes
From the article about the author.
About Sarah Jones
Sarah joined Politicususa in February of 2009. Sarah brings a wide-ranging background of personal and professional experience to Politicus. Her interest in politics goes back to her early years. She is a life-long Democrat
After reading the articles tone and looking at the bio of the author it's easy to see that this is little more than a misinformation piece to try and slander the people who oppose the building of that mosque in that location. It's strangely odd how there's no mention in the article of when those other businesses such as the mentioned strip clubs opened for operation. Could they have been there prior to 9-11 and therefore not be relevant to the modern day debate? Seems also curiously absent from the article that no mention was made of the fact that landing gear from one of the planes landed at the area where the mosque is to be built and that's the reason that the area two blocks away is considered by some to be sacred.
Just for thought here at the risk of sounding like some of the pudits against the mosque. How many of the 9-11 hijackers were strippers or servers at Hooters? The opposition to building the mosque is about the fact that the hijackers were all radical muslims and that it is an inappropriate symbol to build a muslim shrine in the immediate vicinity of their attack.
On one last interesting side note as well, Harry Reid will be pleased to know that he is now part of the republican movement against this since he has also now publicly condemned it as have many other democrats who never knew apparently that the author of this so called story considers them part of the republican masses.
- 7 votes
"...fact that landing gear from one of the planes landed at the area where the mosque is to be built and that's the reason that the area two blocks away is considered by some to be sacred."
Some folks are now worshippiing landing gear?
Bring out the holy hand grenade of Antioch!
- 30 votes
no mention in the article of when those other businesses such as the mentioned strip clubs opened for operation. Could they have been there prior to 9-11 and therefore not be relevant to the modern day debate?
You do know that their existing mosque is six blocks away from the proposed new site, right?
Harry Reid will be pleased to know that he is now part of the republican movement against this since he has also now publicly condemned it as have many other democrats who never knew apparently that the author of this so called story considers them part of the republican masses
Ah, mid term elections, let's take Harrys pulse again after elections and find out what he really thinks.
- 15 votes
I have seen several seeds suggesting strip clubs and gay bars ON NEWSVINE so, OK opinion piece, but has its roots in intolerance! Been seen HERE!
- 8 votes
If the site was such sacred, holy ground... Why didn't these people buy it when it was on the market in order to set up the memorial they obviously are obsessing over?
- 19 votes
Some folks are now worshippiing landing gear?
I didn't try to claim there was sanity to the reasoning only stated why some appear to feel that way.
- 2 votes
Just for thought here at the risk of sounding like some of the pundits against the mosque. How many of the 9-11 hijackers were strippers or servers at Hooters?
How many murderers in this country are men? If we apply the same logic to that question as people are applying to Muslims then it looks like they all are.
How many Christian or religious domestic terrorists have we had in this country? Army of God, KKK, Christian Identity, Christian Patriot, Lambs of Christ, Huratee, Jewish Defense League and of course McVeigh, Roeder.
You don't see the country demanding Christians move their churches away from doctors clinics or government buildings. I bet the Catholic Church can build a church next to a playground.
This whole thing should never have gotten this big. It's ridiculous.
- 27 votes
Like the republicans you obviously don't unedstand that criminals are criminals no matter what religion they claim to belong to. The IRA were all criminals who claimed to be catholics so we should not allow the Catholic Church in Northern Ireland. The republicans just talk to make noise not sense.
- 8 votes
The morals in our society (or the lack thereof) is showing... Freedom of religion - BAD! Wrapping around a pole and wiggling for a buck - TOTALLY ACCEPTABLE!
- 6 votes
Wrapping around a pole and wiggling for a buck - TOTALLY ACCEPTABLE!
Hey, don't be trashing on strip clubs! Some of us wouldn't mind them and the mosque being there.
- 5 votes
im with inferno. strippers have rights too.
as far as the mosque, i would defer to the free people of new york on that (although i believe they have the right to open the center). truth is, two of the worlds largest buildings didnt rain down on my head and engulf my city with death and debris from 3000 people. while my world changed that day i am sure not to the degree of those who live and work in the city of new york. out of respect for that i would not open the center if it were up to me.
- 1 vote
Of course, if we're going to ask the families of those who were in the building or the folks who lived in New York City on that terrible day we will also be polling Muslims. So many of these posts read like they don't know that, um, "free" people of New York or America in general includes Muslims.
The point of the article isn't whether or not strippers have rights to live and work near the World Trade Center site. The point is whether or not Muslim Americans do - pointing out the unsavory elements that freely inhabit "sacred ground" merely points out the sheer hypocrisy of the fuss and suggests the hubbub just might really be about some stuff that's even more unsavory.
- 3 votes
There is a pictur in another seed by Carloz showing the mens Club
- 2 votes
Everyone talks about what to do to bother the muslims of the park51 project(ground zero mosque), build a gay strip bar bbq so on.
But it won't bother them, they preach tolerance, and the fact there are already strip clubs and BBQ restauraunts there don't bother them, so will the actions of the bigots.
Of course then the bigots would say "tear down the mosque like they did to WTC". Right lets commit acts of terrorism in response to acts of terrorism. Two wrongs make a right!(Sarcasm)
Then they would say theres no shinto shrine in pearl harbor or a Nazi church at aushcwitz. There is a shinto shrine near pearl harbor and no one was bothered by it. There are german churches there, but no one is bothered by it. People understand that the Nazi were the worst of the germans and do not represent the germans today. Why can't people do the same with Al-Qaeda and Muslims. By the way Imaan supported bush for peace talks with muslims.
And Sharia law won't be implemented because of one mosque/community center. Heck Sharia law hasn't been implemented despite the building of hundreds mosques why should this one matter. Our constitution says separation of church and state which means sharia law won't dominate us no matter how many mosques are built.
I hope my comments prevent future trolling.
- 27 votes
Well said. You captured the whole argument well, and I hope others read it.
- 6 votes
ill troll if you dont mind.
first off, nobody is saying that there shouldnt be any mosques (at least nobody that i support)... so lets get over the idea that others already exist and have existed within a given geography. im sure there are hookers on the streets somewhere as well.
the idea is that this center is NEW. now i dont live in new york. when the towers came down that day, it was a very emotional day for me. however, i can only assume that the suffrage of the residents of new york was much greater. the cleaning of the debris off cars streets buildings everthing. while i hopped on a bus and went to work like i always did, they were scrambling to see if any friends and loved ones were dead. they did this for weeks and weeks and weeks. so who am i to tell them they have to be tolerant.
i am sure that in time healing will occur and memories will be less sharp. one day their may be a monument dedicated to the muslim faith right there at the twin towers... obviously though, that day is not today.
the shrines at pearl harbor were not there before the war against japan was complete were they? Many countries still have issues with what occured during that war.
i would agree with you that sharia law would have a hell of a time getting into our court system. but i wouldnt be suprised if somehow they are allowed to practice it amongst themselves.
on my trolling wrapup,... supporting this mosque is very similar to supporting Dr. Laura and her freedom of speech. my stance is that she has the right to say what she said but think she showed bad taste in saying it.
besides, a week after it opens, everyone will move onto the next big thing.
- 2 votes
If you explore this issue a little bit more, California Militia, you'll find that several mosques in several different communities (one in California and one in Wisconsin come to mind immediately) are being opposed. The protests are not limited to Ground Zero, they are happening routinely to block the building of Islamic places of worship.
And I have to wonder again who we are supposed to be sensitive towards if it doesn't include the Muslim Americans who died in the buildings, their families, and just the average Joe Muslim citizens of New York who survived this tragedy as well...
- 4 votes
Californina Militia -
You have a lot to learn about trolling. That was a crappy troll. Experienced trolls generally have their conclusions wrapped into their statements - and they throw in a few gratuitous insults. I can't give you very high marks since you leave the door open for actual discussion.
"the idea is that this center is NEW"
That's a thought that some have. However, the prayer area is not new. It is currently being used as an 'overflow area' for the larger, real mosque about 10 blocks up Broadway, and it has been used as such for several years now. I tend to think of the Park51 project as a rehabilitation of the current damaged building to allow other uses - and not the introduction of Muslim prayer into an area where it isn't now.
"the shrines at pearl harbor were not there before the war against japan was complete were they?"
There are no shrines at Pearl Harbor, although there are a few Shinto and Buddhist temples within about 5 miles or so of Ford Island. The Shinto Shrine (Hawaii Kotohira Jinsha-Hawaii Dazaifu Tenmangu) is about 6 miles SSE of Ford Island (not too far from Hickham) at 1239 Olomea Street Honolulu, HI 96817-3343 just off of H-1, and it has been there since 1920. The shrine has had an interesting history. Activities diminished (as you can imagine) after Pearl Harbor but the shine didn't actually formally close until 1946. It tried to re-open on the last day of 1947, but it didn't have a priest. Then, in mid-1948 the federal government confiscated the property. The feds tried to sell the property in 1949, but the shrine organization sued the government and won. I haven't looked at the lawsuit - but it may give some interesting insight into federal/religious/'good v. bad idea'-type of situation. The Buddhist Temple (the Byodo-In) was built in 1968.
"i would agree with you that sharia law would have a hell of a time getting into our court system. but i wouldnt be suprised if somehow they are allowed to practice it amongst themselves."
What some Muslims in England have done is to put a 'binding arbitration' clause into contracts. Then, if disputes arise, they take it to a Muslim cleric for 'arbitration'. The cleric then interprets the situation according to Shari'a Law. As long as the final outcome doesn't conflict with 'regular' British laws, then everything is OK. That approach seems to meld 'regular' British Law with Shari'a Law.
You're really going to have to work on your trolling if this is an example of what you can do. I'd point you to some good Newsvine examples, but I'm sure you've already seen them. Practice, practice, practice.
- 3 votes
The only reason countries are upset with japan are that the japanese killed way more people than pearl harbor and WTC combined and then mulitplied by 10. THe other issue is that the japanese government keep on changing numbers and don't always take full responsibility.
shebow "And I have to wonder again who we are supposed to be sensitive towards if it doesn't include the Muslim Americans who died in the buildings, their families, and just the average Joe Muslim citizens of New York who survived this tragedy as well..."
you are only supposed to be sensative when it comes to family. you should be sensative to everyone, not just the muslims who were caught up in the tragedy, but all americans who were. seems that in our defense of the minority we have forgotten that the majority also has feelings that can be hurt.
My point, which you so neatly missed CA Militia, is that the people opposing this mosque use language that suggests the Muslim American community is tied ONLY to those 19 individuals who terrorized the entire country on that horrible day. They are using language that suggests our country is at war with a religion that is followed by some 7 million American citizens. The opponents also speak with great solemnity about honoring the families of the victims when they demand the cultural center move elsewhere - even though a great many of the families support the center or aren't bothered at all by the idea of it.
I think when you folks are talking about sensitivity and hurt feelings you're only speaking about your own. Now that's a minority opinion. Maybe I wasn't in New York City on 9/11/2001, but I think as an American citizen I still have a right to my opinion - even if it hurts you to read it.
- 5 votes
so who am i to tell them they have to be tolerant.
Our constitution demands it; we ARE Americans, and that is the very thing we stand for; equality and tolerance.
It's unpatriotic to say otherwise.
i am sure that in time healing will occur and memories will be less sharp. one day their may be a monument dedicated to the muslim faith right there at the twin towers... obviously though, that day is not today.
It's almost been a decade; I say that day is now. Prejudice has run rampant for too long. It's time to heal the wounds.
supporting this mosque is very similar to supporting Dr. Laura and her freedom of speech.
That's not a good comparison; she's very deliberately, being intolerant and demeaning someone of a different skin color. She's egging on violence and segregation.
These Muslims have already CLEARLY stated they are peaceful, and do not mean any harm to us. Why do you group all Muslims into a negative light? You're suggesting that all Muslims are out to kill us.
The only reason countries are upset with japan are that the japanese killed way more people than pearl harbor and WTC combined and then mulitplied by 10.
Well, let's not forget we've killed many of them; and without good cause...just sayin', we're not exactly pure as the driven snow.
Other countries don't hate us because of our freedom...
And I have to wonder again who we are supposed to be sensitive towards if it doesn't include the Muslim Americans who died in the buildings, their families, and just the average Joe Muslim citizens of New York who survived this tragedy as well..
I am one who lost a dear friend in the attacks, and I support this mosque. He wasn't killed my Muslims or their religion; he was killed by intolerance and extremism.
If you want to fight terrorists, fight intolerance, not a religion.
- 7 votes
"...cause...just sayin', we're not exactly pure as the driven snow."
Uh oh. There! Now you've gone and done it! You've just completely destroyed any argument that you may have had in the minds of a large sector of those who oppose the project.
Everyone knows that we are as pure as the driven snow. Who has saved the world at least twice, and probably three times in the past century? We have. Which is the best country on the face of the Earth - better than any that exists now, has existed in the past, or that will probably exist in the future? Ours. We apologize to no people - we don't have to, we have never done anything that warrants an apology, and even if we did, either they had it coming, they owe us for everything we've done for them so we get to say and do as we please, or they are so much lower on the ladder of evolution it would be a waste of time. Hell, it's distasteful enough to show simple respect - who are they that they have earned our respect?
No - your very own words reveal you to be un-American and certainly not one of 'we the people'. You are probably a 'closet-Muslim'.
- 7 votes
Strippers didn't fly airplanes in the WTC and kill 3,000 people.
- 4 votes
Muslims didn't diddle little boys. Why are churches allowed near elementary schools?
- 26 votes
Its not a mosque. It is an Islamic Community Center. Good grief people a thirteen story building that only dedicates two stories for *prayer rooms*, does not indicate that its a mosque. If you don't like Muslims just because they are Muslims just say so.
At least then you can get your story straight and consistent. Just remember that those people that you are ostracising are Americans to, living and dying every day just like everyone else.
- 11 votes
If you don't like Muslims just because they are Muslims just say so.
Yes, please. Just come out and tell us how you feel about the sand @!$%#s building their dirty little idols to Satan all over our once great country. I'm so sick of the @!$%#ing coded dog whistles the GOP throws out. If it was about "Sacred Ground Zero" (which is one of the most blasphemous violations of the ten commandments I've ever heard), why are the same groups opposing mosques all over the US?
We get it - ya'll hate muslims. Just think - there are a smaller percentage than Germany had of the Jews in 1930. Why not go for a Final Solution to your problem?
WTF is wrong with this country?
- 6 votes
Strippers didn't fly airplanes in the WTC and kill 3,000 people.
You're right. But in the Quentin Tarantino version, they did.
- 5 votes
Strippers didn't fly airplanes in the WTC and kill 3,000 people.
You're right. But in the Quentin Tarantino version, they did.
I would so watch that movie. Does that make me a terrible person?
- 5 votes
Al-Qaeda flew the plane into WTC. Now the question is, does a small radical group represent a whole religion. Think of all the crazy christians throughout history and what people have done in name of God. They don't represent the christian religion. Why should Al Qaeda? It is frivilous comparing them to the whole religion. Maybe everytime westboro goes to protest a soldiers funeral, we should see them as representing christian religion.
- 5 votes
Al-Qaeda flew the plane into WTC. Now the question is, does a small radical group represent a whole religion. Think of all the crazy christians throughout history and what people have done in name of God. They don't represent the christian religion. Why should Al Qaeda? It is frivilous comparing them to the whole religion. Maybe everytime westboro goes to protest a soldiers funeral, we should see them as representing christian religion.
That is exactly right, and bears repeating.
- 5 votes
Concerned about topless bars? Surely you jest! Toppless dancing is just some individual's way of exercising their First Amendment rights...correct? And of course this whole dustup has been about the Constitution...correct?
I will admit though that this is the most cleaver and elegant strawman that's been put out there yet.
- 3 votes
I think the point just zipped over your head. Take your sarcasm detector in for repair: it needs calibration.
- 17 votes
I will admit though that this is the most cleaver and elegant strawman that's been put out there yet.
That strawmans' got a cleaver in it!
Holy crap!
http://friendsoftheprogram.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/its-a-trap.jpg
- 3 votes
No one is "concerned" about the strip clubs near Ground Zero. But to have them and then fight the building of a cultural center that happens to be Muslim is the irony. You do see that, right? Strip clubs are morally acceptable, but religious centers aren't. Let them BOTH exist.
- 5 votes
Not in the least you did not understand what you read. nobody is
oops euterpe said it already
- 2 votes
For the one-millionth time. It has nothing to do with the constitution. Their right to build the mosque is not the objection. It's their insensitivity.
There are many people in this country who do things that others might regard as "insensitive". Do we prevent them from doing things that are legal simply because someone thinks they are insensitive to others? No, because then we would be trampling on many peoples civil rights. Just about anything could be construed as being insensitive by someone else, but we have laws to protect our people from each other's erratic emotional responses.
- 5 votes
I'm more than old enough to remember when it was inappropriate for blacks to sit at lunch counters and sacred ground such as cemeteries was segregated since it wasn't proper to put "those people" to rest next to us white folk. Would someone please explain to me how banning people from making use of their own property ( a basic principle of capitalism, I believe) is any different than segregating blacks into their "appropriate" place fifty years ago?
- 20 votes
Because the sins of a few are greater then the whole of a culture. Unless its "us" then the few are devants that didn't fit into society.
- 2 votes
You are comparing apples and oranges. What was done to black citizens was reprehensible. This is an arguement about compassion and of understanding for the families of the victims.
Surely, those of you that support the building of the mosque also support the building os a strip club, right? After all, you'd not want to come across as some sort of hypocrites, right?
You cannot cherry pick the causes you like. If it's one group's Constitutional rights, it's also the rights of all.
- 9 votes
Go for it. I have no objections whatsoever. Once again, you miss the irony of the situation. It is your side that is picking and choosing.
- 16 votes
You cannot cherry pick the causes you like. If it's one group's Constitutional rights, it's also the rights of all.
Didn't you at least hear something whizzing by when it went over your head? And I'm not FOR anyone building anything. I'm FOR anyone that has gone through the proper processes to be able to do whatever is lawful. That's all. Oh, without bigots screaming in their faces and making all of us look ugly, if that's possible.
- 9 votes
lol, I have no problem whatsoever with a strip club; what the author was pointing out, (and you seemed to be looking in the opposite direction) was that the republicans are the ones saying one can't build something that is supposed to be protected by the separation of church and state clause, as that land is...."sacred" because a wheel landed on it....while saying they're going to build something opposite of it that they themselves are opposed to having built...just to piss off these "terrorists."
You DO know the republican right is also the religious right, correct?
You DO know the religious people of this country often preach against strip clubs and any other erm..."ungodly" behavior, right?
And you DO know that they're proposing a GAY bar, nonetheless! The same gays that they are so feverishly trying to oppress with the prop 8!
Do you see the irony? Because they sure don't.
They're going to be supporting EVERYTHING they're opposed to just for committing the "eye for an eye" actions that Christ himself looked down on as immoral. XD
They're proposing a strip club on this "sacred ground!"
- 6 votes
Surely, those of you that support the building of the mosque also support the building os a strip club, right? After all, you'd not want to come across as some sort of hypocrites, right?
No problem. They can build all the strip clubs there that they want. More power to them.
- 6 votes
You cannot cherry pick the causes you like. If it's one group's Constitutional rights, it's also the rights of all.
Yes, that's the whole point. I hear chest-thumping b----ing about the mosque, but no chest-thumping b----ing about Ground Zero lap dances. I guess Ground Zero is "sacred" only to the extent where we embrace those silicone yahbos but keep out those dern towerlheads.
- 8 votes
Surely, those of you that support the building of the mosque also support the building os a strip club, right?
Yes! What makes you think otherwise?
- 5 votes
Surely, those of you that support the building of the mosque also support the building os a strip club, right?
I'll support strip clubs the moment the bouncers don't ask about how old I am.
- 6 votes
No we say the BS about this being sacred ground is BS. Carloz has a nice article on what is in this sacred ground go look for yourself. that one article blows the hell out of this silly argument that this is somehow scred ground. Now we have people expanding the size of the catastrophy so the edge is closer to the site of this center.
- 5 votes
No one is saying that they don't have the right to build. People are questioning the motive. The Muslims should show some compassion for the victims families.
I think that their motive is to show Muslims around the world that the U.S. is not at war with Islam.
I think that they are trying to make the world a place where there will not be more victims' families that need compassion.
- 5 votes
OK it's an opinion piece but the Lady has a point. No-one is asking the clubs to be moved and of course those same fine people didn't get busted for having a meeting in such a place. That would look bad for them and lord knows we can't have them getting caught saying things like "I was spanking her" because this is the party of family values. The same people who fund raised for "Tits for Pops"...I mean "Toys for twats"..I mean "Toys for Tots"..whew almost let the cat out the bag but they'll clean it up in the editing room at Fox and give it a History rewrite when needed.
- 11 votes
I couldn't agree more that if the communities zoning laws allow strip clubs in a neighborhood my being offended by them is of less importance than their constitutional rights. The present attacks on the constitution, no matter the camouflage used, are much more frightening than a religious center or even, G*d forbid, a strip club.
- 9 votes
First and foremost, stripers did not fly planes into buildings on the site, Muslims did. The objection to have a mosque on the site has nothing to do with family values but respect for the families who lost love ones on 9-11. More and more muslims are speaking out about the lack of respect to those families that building this mosque would be. some are even saying that building this mosque there would show that Muslims have conquered America. We have enough of that with illegals, we don't need another group that feels that it has superior intentions in america. The objections have nothing to do with whether it is legal just respect. Still waiting for apologizes from Muslims. america is expected to apologize for everything why hasn't the individual that we are paying to travel say that 9-11 was wrong.
This article is nothing but a blog by another liberal and achieves nothing.
So I assume all Catholic Churches near elementary schools should be closed forthwith, and all churches near abortion clinics shut down as well?
After all, we must protect the victims sensibilities and damn all of a particular faith for the sins of a few! Or does your thinking only apply to Muslims? If so, I smell the rank stench of hypocrisy.
- 17 votes
We have enough of that with illegals,
respect for the families who lost love ones on 9-11
Wedge issues created by the GOP. Stats for illegal immigration has been in a downward trend for years.
The most important thing on most American citizens minds is the economy and during mid term elections the GOP goes where? The NYC mosque and anti immigration. This leaves me to believe they have nothing to offer on the economy.
Personally I have no problems with the mosque, however if you do, you should write to Republican Senator Orrin Hatch who introduced a bill in the Senate as S.2869 on July 13, 2000, known as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. A Republican Congress passed the bill. The bill, among other things, legally protects religions from most local and state zoning laws.
Then ask your Republican congressman why they are not addressing the existing Pentagon mosque as well.
Right-wing silence about Pentagon mosque betrays Ground Zero flap as phony wedge issue
http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2010/08/06/right-wing-silence-concerning-pentagon-mosque-betrays-ground-zero-flap-as-trumped-up-wedge-issue/
Still waiting for apologizes from Muslims
Google it, there are pages of denouncements from Muslim clerics and academics concerning 9/11, however this is not newsworthy enough by most media outlets.
- 17 votes
Adipic, if you feel that Catholic churchs are hurting families, then yes the church should respect those families that are hurt. The assumption of hurt to families is not sufficient to ask for respect but the families in NY have been hurt.
As for the pentagon mosque, this is to serve military members; however, there are relatively few muslims around where they want to build the mosque in NY.
- 1 vote
if you feel that Catholic churchs are hurting families
The people in SNAP sure think so, so by your reasoning all Catholic churches near schools should be dismantled under state authority. Or, once again, does your fear and prejudice only extend to Muslims?
Me personally? Let em build it. I'm more likely to avail myself of the strip club, personally, but this is America, not a Christian version of Saudi Arabia, no matter how much the Christian Taliban wants it to be.
Remember, if you want to deny this, then you can't condemn the whackdoodles in Afghanistan blowing up Buddhas or the Hindu fundamentalists in India killing Christian missionaries. You've essentially admitted that your co-religionists are just as intolerant.
- 8 votes
there are relatively few muslims around where they want to build the mosque in NY.
Before 1970 there were fewer than ten mosques in New York City—now there are well over a hundred, indicating the rapid growth of New York City’s Muslim population.
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/news/01/05/muslim.html
“Numbering an estimated 600,000, Muslims now represent one of the fastest growing religious communities in New York City,” said Peter Awn, co-principal investigator and
Columbia University dean of the School of General Studies. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/news/04/09/muslims.html
As for the pentagon mosque, this is to serve military members
??? They can serve in our military as US citizens and a mosque is sanctioned on your behalf but as tax paying citizens of NYC they are excluded from providing citizens a community center???? Do explain this hole you have dug yourself into.
- 5 votes
The assumption of hurt to families is not sufficient to ask for respect but the families in NY have been hurt.
Yeah, the notion that altar-boy-touching priests have actually hurt those boys and their families is simply an empty assumption. After all, everyone could use an unsolicited fondling every once in a while.
As for the pentagon mosque, this is to serve military members
And that, of course makes it totally OK, because as long as a Muslim is in the US military, then they're immune to generalizations about Muslims and 9/11. This makes perfect sense.
- 5 votes
Geez, Beckyal, fundamentalist Christians with military training blew up the Oklahoma City federal building; a fundamentalist Christian bombed women's health clinics AND the olympic park in Atlanta. Catholic priests diddle anyone under 18 not otherwise protected from them. I am still waiting for my apologies from all fundamentalists and every single catholic - whether or not they agree or find morally repugnant what these people did. Doesn't matter. Paint 'em all with the same brush. Enemies of the state. Enemies of MINE.
You must also be a strong supporter of apologies and repairations for descendants of slaves, the tribes that occupied this country before the european terrorist invasions began, and the american citizens who were interred in this country during WWII.
Just to avoid any confusion, read this with a note of sarcasm.
- 3 votes
No stop right there Terrorists who may have been muslims did....
McVeigh was a christian did we tell Oklahoma no christian information sites within x amount of blocks from his ground zero? Fo x put as many blocks in there as you choose.
- 2 votes
It's funny how Republicans endorsed actions in the Middle East which were designed to liberate 59,000,000 Muslims but they can't handle a Muslim community center that includes a culinary school and basketball court which is open to the public.
Not only that, many 9/11 victims families are in support of it. Look it up.
- 14 votes
You need to get out of this left wing echo chamber for a while and talk to some Americans.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_state_surveys/new_york/58_in_new_york_oppose_mosque_near_ground_zero
Hedward, Popularity of an idea might not be the surest way to judge the merits of it. I can think of many very popular ideas such as the Holocaust which were popular with the citizens of the place it was occurring. The majority has an amazing ability to be amoral at best and evil at worst. Please don't hang your arguments on the position of the majority. Reason will make your argument much stronger.
- 12 votes
In case you haven't noticed yet, http://www.rasmussenreports.com polls always lean to the right compared to non-biased polls on the Internet.
That has nothing to do with our civil rights anyway.
- 2 votes
Holocaust? Are you for real? We're talking about moving the mosque uptown in a city that already has many mosque's to begin with. Spare us the melodrama.
- 1 vote
ou need to get out of this left wing echo chamber for a while
rassmussin? Bwahhhhaahhhahhah
- 3 votes
If the city has many mosques, why does the one needed to meddled with?
Hedward, Reference 12.4 No, I wasn't at the moment discussing the mosque. I was drawing your attention to a logical fallacy called argumentum ad populum. It is not all that unusual to use argumentum ad adsurdum to make a point, however. I just am trying to keep the argument going on an intellectual rather than an emotional (popularity) level. Polls only measure opinion, not how they were arrived at.
- 1 vote
Obviously, most Americans know very well that most Muslims are peaceful and had nothing to do with 9-11. There is no reason to treat the mosque any differently than any other building in the area of Ground Zero. Republicans are just trying to use this wedge issue to inflame the passions of non-muslims in order to try to get themselves back in power.
The closest thing to the current Republican Party is the pre-WWII Nazi Party in Germany. They inflamed the passions of non-Jews (their most convenient target) to get themselves into power and then continued their run of hatred until they were stopped.
There's no magic in preying on the base fears and hatreds of the masses in order to gain power. Muslims and illegal aliens are simply the most convenient target for unscrupulous Republicans to use at this time. What's next, maybe a night of broken glass aimed at mosques? You and I both know that there are right-wingers in every community who would join in if that ever happened.
When a party has no legitimate reason to get people to vote for them, using hatred and bigotry can be a quick shortcut to power. It has worked many times before throughout the world.
- 11 votes
I don't know about your statement Roger, someone should do a seed asking how many Americans think we are at War with Islam, I would guess about 40%. give or take.
We are obviously not at war with Islam, nor have we ever been at war with them. If we had been, then all Muslims in this country would be prisoners of war. Even Bush/Cheney never said that we were at war with all of Islam. That would be ridiculous. We were/are at war only with terrorists. If you want to hate all Muslims, and if you consider yourself to be at war with all of Islam, that's up to you, I guess, but you would be part of a very small minority of right-wing extremists who believe that.
- 4 votes
I don't know about your statement Roger, someone should do a seed asking how many Americans think we are at War with Islam, I would guess about 40%. give or take.
On Newsvine the right wingers know all you have to do is delete the cookie and you can vote numerous time along with their multiple logins they would run it up to 90%
- 3 votes
I would put the number more at 60% of the general population. Sigh... As for the neo-cons on Newsvine, I agree with you totally.
- 2 votes
All those welfare Moms need jobs send them to work at the strip club so all the GO Perverts can throw dolla dolla bills at them. Make it Rain John McCain.
- 4 votes
What, you have just insulted a whole group of people you don't know and that many of them object to the strip club but we are talking about why the mosque should not be build verses the strip club. also remember that the article is someone's blog not fact.
- 1 vote
What, you have just insulted a whole group of people you don't know
Did you know that irony doesn't mean "made of iron?"
- 7 votes
remember that the article is someone's blog not fact.
So you're saying that there isn't a strip club near ground zero?
- 3 votes
Say it ain't so, that was the only reason I was going next weekend.
- 1 vote
Its there here is the link to things the same distance as the culture center
http://daryllang.com/blog/4421
I did not see some rightie say this seed was from a blog did I?
- 1 vote
Here's a few links to articles and photos about the "adult entertainment" available in the "ground zero" area:
Mosque gets all the press, but area near Ground Zero full of bars, porn, liquor stores, salons
- 2 votes
You should not attack the American strip clubs after all where would our deviate Republican congressmen go if they closed. Help keep them out of our rest areas.
- 7 votes
Before you cast that stone Beck...........it works both ways. Both parties have disregard for morals.
- 1 vote
Teddy Kennedy before he got remarried went to strip clubs all the time. Didn't seem to bother liberals so why are they throwing stones. Not all republicans stress family values anymore than democrats do. If they do stress the values and get caught then they deserve the insults but if they don't and people don't know if the clubs are used by democrats or republicans then they really shouldn't be throwing stones. Also the article is someone's opinion (blog) and just another way to try to slam individuals since Obama is lossing.
Again, Becky, you miss the irony. Republicans certainly did get their underwear in knots about Ted's indiscretions, yet they find it perfectly acceptable that such an establishment is closer to Most Holy Ground Zero, Peace Be Upon It than this community center is.
It is quite obvious that 90% of the objections to this establishment are xenophobia, plain and simple. We're being as tribal about this as any Pashtun in Afghanistan is.
- 7 votes
90% of the objections to this establishment are xenophobia
Well yeah, xeno's scare the crap outta me
8)
- 3 votes
But with conservatives it is the central part of their platform.
- 1 vote
Also the article is someone's opinion (blog) and just another way to try to slam individuals since Obama is lossing.
I see you in sscotts blog infested seeds do I not. Without blogs the right could not even seed on Newsvine. Go back to the top and read it says Opinion even though your side likes to post things like this as news and you have to change it and sometimes get banned for a time......
- 2 votes
Since the site of the former World Trade Center/Twin Towers is described as
"sacred ground" the place has become almost a religion. Psychologically, it is the worship of death. Combine this with the two futile wars we are still engaged in and it definitely a national worship of death and destruction. The best way to move away from this negativism is to get out of Afghanistan and Iraq, do everything we can to heal our maimed veterans, and build something positive and cheerful on the site. Let's stop this worship of death.
- 4 votes
There are peaceful Muslims......so why don't they do something with those that are killers of women and daughters?
- 2 votes
Why didn't those in a position to speak out against the pedophilia in the Catholic Church do so earlier? Why did the Vatican make it policy to hide and protect and move those priests around?
- 5 votes
Same reason that peaceful Americans are lumped with those that the some muslims want to kill.
- 1 vote
Like lumping peaceful American Muslims with a few terrorists?
- 4 votes
Same reason that peaceful Americans are lumped with those that the some muslims want to kill.
Yeah! If violent Islamic fundamentalists do it, then we can, too!
... oh wait.
- 3 votes
Darlene Bays, what are you personally doing to counteract the messages or actions of Christians or Americans who behave badly, criminally, repugnantly, etc? Did you apologize for the Oklahoma City bombing or for the Columbine massacre? I'm curious since you think that normal people going about their day to day lives in much the same fashion as you or I need to take time out to apologize to you or me because people who claim to believe in the same religion do reprehensible things in the name of it. People tend to respond or react out loud more to those things impacting their actual day to day lives. For peaceful, law-abiding Muslim Americans, they are probably more interested in reflecting to the public more about the unreasonable and unjustified bigotry they are now experiencing routinely from their fellow Americans. Well, what do you know? Something else to apologize about...
- 2 votes
the catholic church was wrong. No one is defending them.
And no one is generalizing the behavior of pedophile priests to all Christians. Therein lies the difference.
- 6 votes
Sorry to say Becky, but the comments you've made make it painfully clear that you don't understand what is being discussed here.
Read up on irony and hypocrisy (also see two-faced).
After that take a glance at the constitution.
Time to hit the (non-Texan) books
- 5 votes
Strip club? it will really be a indoctrination center for nudists... they attempting to subvert the country, nudist camps in backwoods, they have already succeeded... the proposed mosque. Is an abandoned, burlington COAT factory.. the first step in nudism is the coat and hats... nude people are taking over showers and tubs across america.. time to rise up... oh some of you guys already have..
(sarc-humor) have a great hump day everyone.......
- 3 votes
That humor is not lost on me. Another peice of morbid humor: First they came for my coat... but I didn't say anything because I wasn't cold.
- 2 votes
I'm surprised that the GOP who in the past have warned about letting emotion dictate your argument, are using emotion to rally against a Constitutional right.
- 2 votes
You mean the GOP can still surprise you? I understand actually, they still things so outrageous that they surprise me at times too.
- 1 vote
Death of a loved one is emotional..... period. The Muslims should realize what this would do...oh wait....... they do otherwise they would not be doing this. Divide and conquer...works really good in this issue.
I don't think anyone realized what an emotional issue six blocks could be until the GOP made it one. Their existing center is only six blocks away from the new one.
- 3 votes
then keep it there............they saw that this was just another chance to stick it to us.
- 1 vote
they saw that this was just another chance to stick it to us.
Wow, you can read their minds or are you a spokesman for the Muslim community? I'm not going to propose that I can read your mind, but I would guess no on both accounts.
- 5 votes
then keep it there............they saw that this was just another chance to stick it to us.
Wow... So you know what all the peaceful Muslim American citizens are thinking?
- 5 votes
they saw that this was just another chance to stick it to us.
I usually like spirited debate, but "us versus them" comments like this one over the last few days have just been depressing me. "They" are not doing this to hurt your feelings. "They" are peaceful Americans who grew out of their old location, legally purchased new land, and decided to devote almost the entire building to community building projects including a non-religious center for quiet reflection on 9/11. Get over your hate.
- 7 votes
I would like to know how many Muslims live in the vicinity of the proposed mosque. It looks like the area is a business district. The smart thing would have been to build a mosque near where the flock lives.
Muslims aren't like Methodists. They pray five times a day (at least, they do if they're able). Two of the times are during the work day - one around lunchtime and one around 5:00 or so. They believe that praying in groups is better than praying alone. So - it is good if they have a place that they can easily reach during lunch and around 5 - pray - and then get back to work.
They do not gather together once a week and go to their neighborhood mosque.
- 5 votes
Just to be clear, the plan for the proposed community center, to be called Park51, does not, as the ad, which was paid for by something called the National Republican Trust PAC, might suggest, actually involve spiking a minaret into some smoldering ruins, to the sound of masked men cackling. (“Where we weep, they rejoice.”) It would be on the site of a defunct Burlington Coat Factory, on Park Place, two blocks away from Ground Zero. In the same vicinity, there are several fast-food places, bagel shops, banks, shoe stores, a movie theatre, a couple of churches, at least one gentleman’s club, and, even nearer, Century 21, the discount department store.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2010/07/live-from-ground-zero.html
He said the center has arisen from nothing more than the needs of his burgeoning community. "It's only natural that something like this should happen," he said. "Our community has grown over the last few decades."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/18/AR2010081806714.html
- 3 votes
Talk about a slanderous headline! That's like a headline saying:
"Pro-Choice advocates want millions of babies to die!"
This is yellow journalism at its worst.
- 2 votes
Relax, kathy. The headline is satirical, meant to poke fun at how opponents of the mosque keep calling it "hallowed ground" despite a bevy of distinctly un-hallowed businesses already in operation the same distance from Ground Zero. One is New York Dolls, a gentleman's club. So since no one seems to regard the strip club's proximity to Ground Zero as poor taste, it's bizarre to be so upset about a peaceful community center and mosque.
- 5 votes
I understand why he wrote the headline. However, I find the headline to be of poor taste. I feel that it takes away from the authors points and make the argument look ridiculous from the beginning. It's hard to take someone seriously when they begin their point with an insult to an entire political party.
- 1 vote
When I hear Newt, Palin and the rest come out against closing the strip clubs and bars in this area they call "sacred," I will call this headline inaccurate. But as it stands now, it is right on. GOP like kathy here don't like having their hypocrisy highlighted so clearly.
- 4 votes
Wow. You must be psychic! It's crazy that you know me enough to call me a hypocrite!
It's even funnier because I'm not a Republican.
Get over yourself.
For someone who claims not to be a Republican, you sure have their talking points down pat.
- 4 votes
Because I have an opinion on the headline? I can discuss what your talking points are like, but it would be a waste. You obviously know so much already.
- 2 votes
Because your opinion is a direct match to the GOP talking points on the issue.
- 3 votes
I have yet to give my opinion on the article at all.. I was simply commenting on the headline. You really need to wake up and read before you just start insulting.
Please follow CoH. Thank you.
Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks.
- 1 vote
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



